If you’re launching a charitable initiative and exploring fiscal sponsorship, you’ve likely encountered references to “Model A” and “Model C.” These are the two most common structures used in the U.S. nonprofit sector. While the terminology can sound technical, understanding the difference between these models is essential to choosing the right path for your project.
At PPF, we regularly work with individuals and organizations seeking to make an impact both with, and without, forming a separate nonprofit. Below, we break down the core distinctions between Model A and Model C fiscal sponsorship, including how they work, their respective benefits, and who they’re best suited for.
Fiscal sponsorship is a legal arrangement in which a 501(c)(3) nonprofit (the sponsor) supports a mission-aligned project that (usually) does not have its own tax-exempt status. This allows the project to:
It’s a legitimate, IRS-recognized alternative to forming an independent nonprofit and particularly useful for early-stage, time-limited, or pilot projects. You can read more about fiscal sponsorship in our blog titled “What is Fiscal Sponsorship, and How Does It Work?”
Now let’s look at the two most common types of fiscal sponsorship.
In Model A, the project becomes a fully integrated program of the sponsor. This means:
This is the most comprehensive form of fiscal sponsorship, offering full administrative and operational compliance support.
In simple terms: the sponsor adopts the project and manages it as an internal program, while the advisor runs operations.
In Model C, the project is a separate legal entity (traditionally a nonprofit corporation) that receives funding through a grant relationship with the sponsor. The sponsor receives charitable donations and re-grants the funds to the project for IRS-approved charitable activities. This means:
In simple terms: The sponsor acts as a grantmaker to an external charitable project.
|
Feature |
Model A |
Model C |
|
Legal status of project |
Program of sponsor |
Separate legal entity |
|
Asset ownership |
Sponsor owns assets |
Project owns assets |
|
Employment |
Staff facilitated by sponsor |
Staff employed by project |
|
Level of support |
Full administrative support |
Limited support, grant relationship only |
|
Sponsor liability |
High (full responsibility) |
Low (grant oversight) |
|
Ideal for |
Long-term projects or founders new to nonprofit work |
Independent initiatives needing 501(c)(3) access |
Here are a few questions to consider:
Both models are legitimate and useful, but they serve different needs. What matters most is aligning the structure with your goals, resources, and operational capacity.
Fiscal sponsorship is more than a legal arrangement; it’s a strategic partnership. Whether you choose Model A or Model C, it’s important to understand the expectations, responsibilities, and level of support involved.
Before entering into a fiscal sponsorship agreement, ask questions, read the fine print, and choose a sponsor whose values and approach align with your mission. The right fit can empower your project to launch with clarity, stability, and the confidence to make a lasting impact.